Factpages Norwegian Offshore Directorate
Factpages Norwegian Offshore Directorate
sodir.no          Norsk
23.11.2024 - 01:30
Time of last synchronization with Norwegian Offshore Directorate's internal systems

ANDREW FM

Export: PDF icon PDF
  • General information

    General information
    Attribute Value
    Lithostrat. unit
    The lithostratigraphic unit's official name.
    ANDREW FM
    NPDID lithostrat. unit
    Norwegian Offshore Directorate's unique id for lithostratigraphic units.
    5
    Level
    Indicates the lithostratigraphic unit's level. Legal values: GROUP, FORMATION, MEMBER.
    FORMATION
    Lithostrat. unit, parent
    The parent lithostratigraphic unit's official name. See also level. Will be empty if Level = GROUP.
  • Level below

    Level below
    Lithostrat. unit
  • Description

    Andrew Formation

    Name
    Named by Deegan & Scull (1977) after the Andrew Field in UK blocks 18/27 and 16/28.
    Well type section
    UK well 14/25-1 from 2199 m to 1897 m, coordinates N58°01'11.40", E 00°00'56.40". No cores.
    Well reference section
    UK well 21/10-1 from 2464 to 2370 m, coordinates N 57°43'50.37", E 00°58'29.19" (Fig 5.44) . No cores.
    Thickness
    The Andrew Formation is 302 m thick in the type well and 94 m in the reference well, which represents the general thinning southwards from the East Shetland Platform. Close to the Fladen Ground Spur, the formation reaches thicknesses of approximately 1200 m.
    Lithology
    The Andrew Formation consists of sandstones with claystone interbeds. The sandstones are generally very fine to medium grained and are composed of subangular to subrounded, clear to orange-stained quartz and feldspar grains. The sandstones are poorly sorted and often have a calcareous cement. Thin stringers of limestone occur.
    Basal stratotype
    The Andrew Formation overlies the shales, marls and limestone interbeds of the Våle Formation , reflected by a higher gamma-ray level in the Andrew Formation. It may also rest on the Maureen Formation , and in that case the boundary is still seen as an increase in gamma-ray readings upwards into the less calcareous Andrew Formation (Fig 5.44) .
    Characteristics of the upper boundary
    The Lista Formation usually overlies the Andrew Formation, and the boundary is characterized by higher gamma-ray readings and lower velocity upwards into the Lista Formation . Where the Forties Formation directly overlies the Andrew Formation, the boundary may be difficult to define, but the Forties Formation generally has a lower velocity than the Andrew Formation (Fig 5.44) . This boundary is very difficult to determine in the Norwegian sector.
    Distribution
    The Andrew Formation was deposited as an elongated lobe trending southeastwards from the western part of the Fladen Ground Spur into the Central Trough. The formation is not well developed in the Norwegian sector, even though the distal parts of the lobe may be expected to occur. Its approximate distribution is shown in (Fig 5.47) .
    Age
    Paleocene.
    Depositional environment
    The Andrew Formation was deposited as submarine fans.
    Source
    • Isaksen, D. and Tonstad, K. (eds.) 1989: A revised Cretaceous and Tertiary lithostratigraphic nomenclature for the Norwegian North Sea. NPD-Bulletin No. 5, 59 pp.
  • Wellbores penetrating

    Wellbores penetrating
    Wellbore name
    Wellbore completion date
    Top depth [m]
    Bottom depth [m]
    30.08.2008
    3366
    3482
    07.07.2021
    3072
    3094
    09.04.1976
    3197
    3253
    17.02.1977
    2947
    2952
    17.05.1987
    2944
    2949
    12.08.1977
    3030
    3033
    02.08.2003
    2989
    2992
    06.03.1985
    3066
    3102
    08.11.2019
    3040
    3070
    20.02.1990
    2780
    2808
    04.07.1993
    2796
    2808
  • Wellbores with cores

    Wellbores with cores
    Wellbore name
    Wellbore completion date
    Core length [m]
    30.08.2008
    29
    20.02.1990
    17