15/12-10 S
Export: PDF
-
General information
-
Wellbore history
GeneralThe well is positioned on the western flank of the northern segment of the Varg Field, on a horst mapped at Top Sleipner level. Thick Intra Heather sandstones present in the southern and eastern segments of Varg were expected also in the northern segment. Over the horst, Draupne/Heather shales were assumed eroded so that Intra Heather sandstones were present between BCU and Top Sleipner. These two horizons could be mapped seismically, but the extent of sandstones could not be mapped. The well was drilled to determine the extent and thickness of the Intra Heather sandstone reservoir over the northern segment of Varg and, if oil was encountered, to determine fluid characteristics and depth to the OWC.Operations and resultsAppraisal well 15/12-10 S was drilled from the S4 slot on the Varg subsea template using the semi-submersible installation Deepsea Bergen. It was spudded on 2 October 1996 and drilled deviated to TD at 3550 m in the Triassic Skagerrak Formation. The deviation started at 250 m, building angle to 35 deg at 960 m and was then kept between 28 deg and 38 deg down to TD. No significant problems were encountered in the operations. The well was drilled with seawater down to 207 m, with seawater/PAC/CMC from 207 m to 1396 m, and with Ancovert oil based mud from 1396 m to TD. No shallow gas was predicted and no shallow gas was found in the well.Down to Top Shetland, the well was within prognosis, and penetrated the expected lithology. Below this level, the Shetland limestone was thicker than expected, and Top Cromer Knoll and Base Cretaceous was penetrated considerably deeper than prognosed (55 and 58 metres, respectively). Below BCU, the well encountered Late Jurassic shales and siltstones, and only 13 metres TVD of poor quality Intra Heather Sandstone was penetrated at 3372 - 3388 m (2924 - 2937 m TVD MSL) in the lower part of the Late Jurassic section. This was considerably less than prognosed, and the poor reservoir quality seen in the well also proved a rapid facies variation between 15/12-6 S and -10 S, probably controlled by faulting. The Intra Heather Sandstone was oil bearing, but had poor reservoir characteristics. MDT fluid samples from the top of the unit were contaminated with oil from the oil-based drilling mud, but analyses showed that the oil was of the same type as the oil found in well 15/12-6 S. The Intra Heather Sandstone section was deeper than the anticipated OWC for this part of the field (2920 m TVD MSL), and the base of the interval represented an ODT, indicating that sandstones in this area contain oil down to a deeper level than previously assumed.Top Sleipner and Top Triassic were penetrated close to prognosis, and a core taken in the Triassic was in parts heavily tectonized. The borehole imager (UBI) indicated faulting at the top of the Intra Heather Sandstone, and in the Sleipner formation.One conventional core was cut from 3427 - 3448 m in the Triassic Skagerrak Formation. An MDT sampling run collected fluid in two sample chambers at 3372.15 m (2947.04 m TVD RKB).The well was re-classed to cuttings-injector 15/12-A-4 on 4. November 1996.TestingNo drill stem test was performed -
Cuttings at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate
Cuttings at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate Cuttings available for sampling?YESCuttings at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate Cutting sample, top depth [m]Cutting samples, bottom depth [m]1400.003550.00 -
Cores at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate
Cores at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate Core sample numberCore sample - top depthCore sample - bottom depthCore sample depth - uom13427.03446.6[m ]Cores at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate Total core sample length [m]19.6Cores at the Norwegian Offshore Directorate Cores available for sampling?YES -
Core photos
-
Lithostratigraphy
Lithostratigraphy Top depth [mMD RKB]Lithostrat. unit10710961142140825502550255926072766276628503097310732043204322432613261337233883420342034293429 -
Geochemical information
Geochemical information Document nameDocument formatDocument size [MB]pdf5.24 -
Documents – reported by the production licence (period for duty of secrecy expired)
Documents – reported by the production licence (period for duty of secrecy expired) Document nameDocument formatDocument size [MB]pdf27.53 -
Logs
Logs Log typeLog top depth [m]Log bottom depth [m]DSI NGT GPIT AMS17253547MDT GR AMS32983532MDT GR AMS33723383MSCT GR31943474MSCT GR31953424MWD - GR RES DIR1073550PEX AIT AMS31643553UBI NGT GPIT AMS31643553VSP MULTILOCK14703540 -
Casing and leak–off tests
Casing and leak–off tests Casing typeCasing diam.
[inch]Casing depth
[m]Hole diam.
[inch]Hole depth
[m]LOT/FIT mud eqv.
[g/cm3]Formation test typeCONDUCTOR30203.036206.00.00LOTINTERM.13 3/81388.0161396.01.60LOTINTERM.9 5/83154.012 1/43160.01.53LOTOPEN HOLE3550.08 1/23550.00.00LOT -
Drilling mud
Drilling mud Depth MD [m]Mud weight [g/cm3]Visc. [mPa.s]Yield point [Pa]Mud typeDate measured2071.2028.0WATER BASED2851.2028.0WATER BASED13961.2028.0WATER BASED20181.3331.0OIL BASED29331.5135.0OIL BASED31351.5233.0OIL BASED31601.5335.0OIL BASED34271.3324.0OIL BASED34481.3723.0OIL BASED35501.3729.0OIL BASED -
Pressure plots
Pressure plots The pore pressure data is sourced from well logs if no other source is specified. In some wells where pore pressure logs do not exist, information from Drill stem tests and kicks have been used. The data has been reported to the NPD, and further processed and quality controlled by IHS Markit.Pressure plots Document nameDocument formatDocument size [MB]pdf0.22